[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: 10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed

How do you decide which one is the woman? is it the most faggoty? The one with the bicycle? Would the most mincing walk be the criterion? Not every gaywise likes pastels. The mind boggles.

2: It's not a real marriage.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

Dr. Niles, how do they think this works? You seem to have an uncanny ability to get into the head of the Gays (I mean no offense - I only mean that the Holy Ghost has given you divine insight). What I wonder is how they think this works. It's awfully confusing. Pastor Douglas Wilson explains,

"When we quarrel with the way the world is, we find that the world has ways of getting back at us. In other words, however we try, the sexual act cannot be made into an egalitarian pleasuring party. A man penetrates, conquers, colonizes, plants. A woman receives, surrenders, accepts.This is of course offensive to all egalitarians, and so our culture has rebelled against the concept of authority and submission in marriage. This means that we have sought to suppress the concepts of authority and submission as they relate to the marriage bed."

I know as a woman, that I am not satisfied, truly satisfied, unless I am in complete submission to Mr. Etheldreda. Any act of rebellion, no matter how small, only harbors bitterness in my flesh. That bitterness doesn't go away until I confess and accept justice. But how do Gays avoid the egalitarian pleasure principles, seeing how they're both men? I hope I'm making sense. I'm awfully confused.